Top Performing Nasdaq ETFs to Watch in 2024

Briefly introduce Nasdaq ETFs and their importance

Nasdaq exchange traded funds (ETFs) have revolutionized how investors access the dynamic technology and growth-oriented sectors of the global economy. These funds track the Nasdaq Composite Index or its subsets, providing diversified exposure to some of the world's most innovative companies without requiring individual stock selection. The importance of Nasdaq ETFs lies in their ability to democratize investing in cutting-edge technologies—from artificial intelligence and cloud computing to biotechnology and renewable energy—that are shaping our future. For Hong Kong investors seeking international diversification, these ETFs offer a convenient gateway to U.S. markets while mitigating single-stock risk. The QQQ stock price, representing the Invesco QQQ Trust, has become a bellwether for technology performance globally, making Nasdaq ETFs particularly relevant for investors looking to capitalize on technological disruption while maintaining liquidity and transparency in their portfolios.

State the purpose of the article: to highlight top performers

This article aims to identify and analyze the top-performing Nasdaq ETFs for 2024, providing investors with a comprehensive framework to evaluate these instruments amid evolving market conditions. With technology sectors experiencing rapid transformation due to advancements in AI, quantum computing, and digital infrastructure, selecting the right ETF requires more than just looking at historical returns. Our purpose is to deliver a meticulously researched assessment that considers performance metrics, risk-adjusted returns, expense efficiency, and sector-specific trends. We will examine how factors like Federal Reserve policy changes, semiconductor cycles, and regulatory developments might impact these funds, with particular attention to their relevance for Hong Kong-based investors navigating currency fluctuations and global market dynamics. By highlighting both established and emerging Nasdaq ETFs, we empower readers to make informed decisions aligned with their investment horizons and risk tolerance.

Criteria used: performance metrics (e.g., YTD return, 1-year return)

Our selection methodology employs a multi-dimensional approach to identify truly exceptional Nasdaq ETFs. Performance metrics include year-to-date (YTD) returns to capture recent momentum, 1-year returns for medium-term perspective, and 5-year annualized returns where available to assess consistency through market cycles. We prioritize risk-adjusted returns using the Sharpe ratio—a measure of excess return per unit of risk—rather than purely chasing high absolute returns. Volatility measurements (standard deviation of returns) help quantify price fluctuation intensity, particularly important for technology-focused funds that tend to exhibit higher beta characteristics. For Hong Kong investors, we also consider currency-hedged share classes where available, as USD/HKD fluctuations can significantly impact returns. Expense ratios are critically evaluated since costs compound over time; we favor funds below 0.40% expense ratio unless justified by exceptional strategy or performance. Liquidity metrics (average daily volume, bid-ask spreads) ensure practical tradability, while tracking error relative to underlying indices reveals management efficiency.

Risk assessment factors (e.g., volatility, Sharpe ratio)

Risk assessment extends beyond volatility to include maximum drawdown measurements—how severely a fund declined during market downturns like the 2022 technology selloff. We analyze concentration risk by examining top-10 holding weights and sector allocation, as overly concentrated ETFs may amplify losses during sector-specific corrections. Interest rate sensitivity is crucial given technology companies' reliance on financing and growth expectations; we assess duration risk through portfolio maturity profiles. For Hong Kong investors, geopolitical risk exposures are considered, particularly regarding U.S.-China technology tensions and their impact on semiconductor holdings. The Sortino ratio, which penalizes only downside volatility, provides additional perspective on risk management. We also evaluate liquidity risk during stress periods by examining market depth and authorized participant structures. ESG integration is increasingly relevant; we note how environmental, social, and governance factors might affect regulatory risks and long-term sustainability of holdings.

Expense ratio considerations

Expense ratios directly erode investor returns, making them a critical selection criterion. We differentiate between legitimate higher costs (e.g., active management with proven alpha generation) and excessive fee structures without corresponding value. For passive Nasdaq ETFs, we typically expect expense ratios between 0.15%-0.35%, while actively managed funds may justify 0.50%-0.75% if demonstrating consistent outperformance. Hidden costs including transaction fees, securities lending revenue retention, and tax efficiency are incorporated into our analysis. Hong Kong investors should note that some U.S.-domiciled ETFs may have dividend withholding tax implications, though many brokers offer synthetic or Dublin-domiciled alternatives to mitigate this. We also consider whether expense ratios have trended downward over time—a positive indicator of competitive pressure benefiting investors—and examine any performance fee structures that might align manager incentives with investor outcomes.

Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) – Benchmark Nasdaq Tracking ETF

The Invesco QQQ Trust stands as the largest and most liquid Nasdaq ETF, tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index of the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq. Its market capitalization-weighted methodology provides concentrated exposure to mega-cap technology leaders, making the QQQ stock price a widely watched indicator of technology sector health. The fund's investment strategy captures disruptive innovation across technology, communication services, and consumer discretionary sectors, with heavy weighting toward companies driving digital transformation. Key holdings include Microsoft (11.2%), Apple (10.8%), NVIDIA (6.5%), Amazon (6.3%), and Meta Platforms (4.7%), creating significant exposure to cloud computing, smartphones, AI semiconductors, e-commerce, and social media. Sector allocation shows approximately 55% technology, 20% consumer discretionary, 15% communication services, and 10% healthcare/biotechnology. Performance data through Q2 2024 shows impressive results: 18.3% YTD return, 32.7% 1-year return, and 18.9% 5-year annualized return. Risk metrics reveal moderate volatility with 18.2% standard deviation and strong risk-adjusted returns evidenced by a Sharpe ratio of 1.15 over three years. The fund's 0.20% expense ratio represents excellent value for its scale and liquidity profile.

First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) – Equal-Weight Technology Focus

QTEC offers a distinctive approach by tracking the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index using equal weighting methodology, reducing concentration risk compared to cap-weighted alternatives. This strategy provides balanced exposure across technology subsectors while maintaining pure-play technology focus—excluding consumer discretionary and healthcare companies found in QQQ. The fund rebalances quarterly to maintain equal weights, systematically buying losers and selling winners to harness mean reversion effects. Key holdings include Broadcom (2.1%), Adobe (2.0%), Advanced Micro Devices (1.9%), Palo Alto Networks (1.9%), and Synopsys (1.8%), creating diversified exposure across semiconductors, software, cybersecurity, and hardware. Sector allocation shows 45% software, 30% semiconductors, 15% hardware, and 10% technology services. Performance demonstrates the strategy's potential: 22.4% YTD return, 36.1% 1-year return, and 20.3% 5-year annualized return. Higher volatility at 22.8% standard deviation reflects smaller average company size, but strong risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio: 1.08) justify the approach. The 0.57% expense ratio is reasonable for its specialized strategy and rebalancing activity.

Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) – Equal-Weight Diversification

QQQE applies equal weighting to the NASDAQ-100 Index, offering a unique alternative to cap-weighted dominance. This approach mitigates overexposure to mega-cap stocks while increasing exposure to mid-cap growth companies within the index, potentially enhancing returns during periods of market breadth expansion. The fund rebalances quarterly to maintain equal weights, providing inherent contrarian discipline. Key holdings include Sirius XM (1.2%), Warner Bros. Discovery (1.1%), Dollar Tree (1.1%), eBay (1.1%), and Lucid Group (1.0%), revealing exposure beyond typical technology giants to include media, retail, and automotive innovation. Sector allocation shows 40% technology, 25% consumer discretionary, 18% communication services, 12% healthcare, and 5% other sectors. Performance data shows solid results: 16.8% YTD return, 28.9% 1-year return, and 16.2% 5-year annualized return. Volatility measures slightly lower than pure technology funds at 17.5% standard deviation, with Sharpe ratio of 0.96 indicating good risk-adjusted performance. The 0.35% expense ratio represents fair value for its diversification benefits and rebalancing strategy.

Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) – Next Generation Leaders

QQQJ targets the "next 100" companies beyond the NASDAQ-100, providing exposure to emerging growth companies before they potentially graduate to the main index. This strategy captures mid-cap innovation at earlier stages, offering higher growth potential though with increased volatility. The fund tracks the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, reconstituted annually and rebalanced quarterly. Key holdings include Coinbase Global (2.5%), Marvell Technology (2.4%), Datadog (2.3%), Zoom Video Communications (2.2%), and Fortinet (2.1%), highlighting exposure to cryptocurrency infrastructure, specialized semiconductors, cloud monitoring, collaboration software, and cybersecurity. Sector allocation shows 60% technology, 20% communication services, 15% consumer discretionary, and 5% healthcare. Performance demonstrates growth characteristics: 19.7% YTD return, 33.5% 1-year return, and 15.8% annualized since October 2020 inception. Higher volatility at 24.3% standard deviation reflects mid-cap focus, while Sharpe ratio of 0.89 indicates reasonable risk-adjusted returns. The 0.15% expense ratio is highly competitive for this growth exposure.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) – Income Generation Strategy

QYLD employs a covered call strategy on the NASDAQ-100 Index, generating high income through option premiums while sacrificing some upside potential. This approach suits income-focused investors seeking technology exposure with reduced volatility. The fund writes at-the-money call options on the index monthly, distributing premiums as dividends. Key holdings mirror the NASDAQ-100 but with option overlay: Microsoft, Apple, NVIDIA, Amazon, and Meta Platforms with call options written against these positions. Sector allocation matches QQQ's composition. Performance shows income focus: 8.9% YTD return including dividends, 15.2% 1-year return, and 7.8% 5-year annualized return with dramatically reduced volatility at 12.1% standard deviation. The strategy's income orientation results in lower Sharpe ratio (0.62) but provides consistent monthly distributions yielding approximately 11-12% annually. The 0.60% expense ratio is justified by the active options strategy and income distribution mechanism. Hong Kong investors should note this fund's distributions may be subject to U.S. withholding tax.

Emphasize that past performance is not indicative of future results

While historical data provides valuable context, investors must recognize that past performance never guarantees future results—especially in technology sectors where disruption accelerates rapidly. The spectacular returns of Nasdaq ETFs in recent years coincided with unprecedented monetary stimulus, digital adoption during pandemic periods, and AI euphoria that may not repeat indefinitely. Valuation metrics suggest many Nasdaq constituents trade at premium multiples requiring continued high growth to justify prices. Structural changes including higher interest rates, geopolitical fragmentation of technology supply chains, and increased regulatory scrutiny could fundamentally alter return profiles. Hong Kong investors should particularly note currency risk—a strengthening U.S. dollar could enhance returns for HKD-based investors, while dollar weakness could diminish them. Scenario analysis considering various growth, inflation, and regulatory outcomes provides more realistic expectation-setting than extrapolating recent performance.

Importance of diversification and aligning investments with personal goals

Despite the allure of technology-focused ETFs, prudent investing requires diversification across asset classes, sectors, and geographies. Nasdaq ETFs typically concentrate in specific sectors and U.S. markets, making them unsuitable as standalone investments. Hong Kong investors should balance technology exposure with allocations to value stocks, international markets (including emerging Asia), fixed income, and alternative assets to mitigate concentration risk. Investment horizon critically determines appropriateness—long-term investors can better weather technology volatility while those nearing retirement may require reduced allocation. Tax considerations differ for Hong Kong investors depending on account types; growth-oriented ETFs may generate less dividend income but higher capital gains. Personal risk tolerance should guide allocation size—technology ETFs' 30-50% drawdowns during bear markets test even committed investors. Regular portfolio rebalancing prevents overconcentration in winning sectors while systematically taking profits.

Monitoring ETF performance and rebalancing portfolio as needed

Active monitoring extends beyond price performance to include tracking error, liquidity changes, and structural developments. Investors should quarterly review whether ETFs continue meeting objectives through metrics like:

• Tracking difference versus benchmark index
• Changes in expense ratios or management
• Liquidity metrics (bid-ask spreads, trading volumes)
• Portfolio turnover and tax efficiency
• Securities lending policies and revenue sharing

Rebalancing thresholds (e.g., when allocation deviates 5-10% from target) prevent emotional decision-making while maintaining strategic allocation. Hong Kong investors should monitor U.S. regulatory changes affecting foreign investors and currency hedging opportunities. Dividend reinvestment policies and tax documentation requirements deserve attention for cross-border investing. Utilizing limit orders rather than market orders improves execution prices given technology ETFs' volatility. During extreme market movements, understanding creation/redemption mechanisms helps avoid liquidity premium/discount issues.

Summary of the top-performing Nasdaq ETFs

The highlighted Nasdaq ETFs represent distinct approaches to technology investing: QQQ offers efficient mega-cap exposure; QTEC provides equal-weight technology concentration; QQQE delivers broad NASDAQ-100 diversification; QQQJ captures emerging growth companies; and QYLD generates income through options strategies. Their strong performances through 2024 reflect technology sector leadership driven by AI implementation, cloud migration, and digital transformation trends. However, their varying risk profiles—from QYLD's lower volatility to QQQJ's higher growth potential—cater to different investor objectives. Hong Kong investors access these funds through numerous brokers, though should consider currency-hedged share classes where available to manage USD/HKD exposure. The funds' liquidity and transparency make them superior to individual stock selection for most investors seeking technology allocation.

Encouragement for readers to conduct their own research before investing

While this analysis provides a research foundation, personal due diligence remains essential before investing. Readers should consult multiple sources including fund prospectuses, annual reports, and independent analyses to fully understand risks and costs. Hong Kong investors should particularly consider tax implications, currency exposure management, and regulatory developments affecting U.S.-listed ETFs. Brokerage platform selection impacts trading costs, currency conversion fees, and available share classes.模拟 trading or small initial positions help familiarize oneself with ETF behavior before committing significant capital. Consulting a fee-only financial advisor familiar with cross-border investing may benefit those with substantial assets. Remember that investing involves risk—including potential loss of principal—especially in volatile sectors like technology. Continuous education about technological trends and market dynamics empowers better decision-making as the investment landscape evolves.

Nasdaq ETFs Investment Strategy Financial Performance

0